If you’ve been following the Spanish news, you’ll know that Spain’s Foreign Minister, José Manuel Albares, appeared before the Congress of Deputies this week to explain the EU-UK agreement on Gibraltar, calling it a “historic” milestone that ends the last pending chapter of Brexit. He said the deal will bring prosperity to both sides of the border without compromising Spain’s long-standing position on sovereignty.
What happened:
Albares described the June agreement as the first comprehensive understanding between Spain and the UK on Gibraltar since the 1713 Treaty of Utrecht. He said it will lead to the removal of La Verja border fence and improve conditions for the 300,000 residents of the Campo de Gibraltar area. The minister stressed that the deal protects Spain’s legal stance and that nothing in the text can be used against it in international courts.
Driving the debate:
His remarks drew sharp criticism from opposition parties who accused the government of secrecy and political spin. The Popular Party’s Carlos Floriano called Albares’s tone “grandiose” and said there was “much rhetoric but little substance,” arguing that Parliament still has not seen a single page of the agreement. Vox went further, labelling the deal “a strategic capitulation” that benefits Gibraltar and undermines Spain’s influence in the Strait.
Between the lines:
While the government insists the agreement will boost regional stability, some MPs and local leaders want greater clarity. Algeciras mayor José Ignacio Landaluce said the lack of transparency leaves border communities in the dark and fuels suspicions that Gibraltar is the main beneficiary.
What they’re saying:
Why it matters:
The parliamentary debate reveals deep divisions over how Spain should manage the next stage of Gibraltar’s relationship with the EU. The outcome will shape cross-border relations, business confidence and mobility for years to come.
What’s next:
Albares has asked the Popular Party to support the agreement when it reaches the European Parliament later this year. The government expects the formal treaty to be signed before the end of 2025, with a four-year transition period once it takes effect. Grab the popcorn.
Following the publication of HMGoG’s guidance on NIF and EORI registration requirements, the GFSB has produced a practical step-by-step playbook to help Gibraltar businesses navigate the process as clearly and confidently as possible. Over recent weeks, many members have contacted us with questions around whether they need a NIF or EORI number, what the process involves, and whether obtaining these registrations could create Spanish tax obligations.
After weeks of questions, confusion and growing concern amongst Gibraltar businesses, HM Government has now published formal guidance on NIF and EORI registration requirements linked to the future customs arrangements under the treaty. This is the clearest explanation yet of what these registrations are, who actually needs them, and perhaps most importantly, what they do not mean.
Gibraltar may be entering a different phase of its development. The expected implementation of the UK-EU Treaty, together with anticipated changes to Gibraltar’s residency rules, could alter the profile of people looking at Gibraltar as a base. If financial thresholds rise, Gibraltar may attract fewer casual applicants and a more concentrated group of internationally mobile, high-value residents. That could include the ultra high net worth market.
This week’s ThriveEDIT member Q&A spotlights Gin on the Rock Ltd, trading as Spirit of the Rock, a micro distillery based in the heart of Gibraltar’s old town, producing world-class spirits and hosting the Gibraltar Gin Experience. With a focus on authenticity, sustainability and products actually made in Gibraltar, this is a business that brings together local craft, visitor experience and plenty of personality.
As we approach the expected provisional application of the Treaty on 15 July 2026, one of the unresolved questions is: what happens to the businesses, entrepreneurs and economically active individuals who want to relocate here but cannot yet see a clear route through the residency system?